Sports… the Philadelphia way

The Good, The Bad, The Ugly - Week 1


Have we reached full panic mode yet? One week into the season, and the Eagles are currently in last place of the NFC East. After being routed by the Falcons to the tune of 14-10, all of the experts must be just about poised to write the Eagles off as entering their inevitable post-Super Bowl loss slump.

But take a look at that score again: 14-10. That’s right, the Eagles lost on the road, to a playoff calibur team by 4 points. Perhaps we need to look a bit more closely at the real implications of this game:

The Good

The Bad

The Ugly

Final Notes

I hate starting off the season with a loss as much as the next guy. Actually, probably more than the next guy. But this one wasn’t that bad. It was a road loss to one of the best teams in the NFC. You can’t win them all. And considering they had to play the best running team without their starting MLB, what do you expect? I honestly felt like the Falcons played one of their better games, and the Eagles played one of their worst. And for that, I am far more confident in the Eagles chances down the stretch than the Falcons.

And one last point - Michael Vick did not win that game last night, the Falcons defense did.



Comments

5 Responses to “The Good, The Bad, The Ugly - Week 1”

  1. Josh on September 13th, 2005 4:00 pm

    Good break down. Agreed on every point. Dawkins was a hero last night and I liked what I saw from Patterson. The O line was suspect though and none of the DEs had any production. We all know Andy is a pass first guy but the running was abysmal. Play action doesn’t work when the LBs immediately drop into pass coverage.

    Somewhat painful to watch but could’ve been much worse.

  2. neverhood.net » Blog Archive » Last night was a big UGH! on September 13th, 2005 4:37 pm

    [...] we’re only just getting started. If you want to read my take on the game, check out my post over at Philly Sports Net. This should be a regular thing, [...]

  3. Micah on September 13th, 2005 5:24 pm

    Very nice analysis. I’ll add a few things.

    First, the cheap shots were being well distributed by the Falcolns. Their game plan was obviously to come out and “out tough” the Eagles and disrupt their conentration with cheap shots. I counted at least three time when Owens got hit after the play.

    In my view, the offensive and defensive lines just weren’t winning their battles. On offense, I trembled with fear at each snap at the ball, because I was sure that the Falcolns D-Line would win the battle.

    I didn’t think McNabb was doing a good job at reading the Falcolns defense. There were a bunch of times when he sent Westbrook running right into the side of an obvious blitz. Also, they needed to take more advantage of the single coverage on the WRs.

    My biggest worry right now is the O-Line. The offense ain’t gonna run unless they do a better job.

  4. That Dude from Philly on September 13th, 2005 11:59 pm

    The D line was dominnt in the 2nd half actually…..this all comes down to Dmac being hurt which effected everything, withthe Falcons playing balls out they only beat us cuz Akers had an untypical game.

  5. Thom on September 14th, 2005 2:07 pm

    Thanks for the comments. I definitely agree on the O-line. While McNabb had enough time on a number of plays, I didn’t feel that confident. Hicks, in particular, seemed to have real problems. It wasn’t Thomas’s best game either.

    As far as the D-line, the DTs played well, but didn’t have the MLB support they needed. The DEs, however, were virtually non-existent. Kearse took sometime to work into the system last season, I think he’ll get back into the swing of things next week.

Leave a Reply




Recent Articles